On the other hand, there are those who are classified as "elderly" who are, in many instances, more physically fit than others who are 10 years younger or more.I know of an 84-year-old who is still teaching full-time in an elementary school. But she always has been a physical fitness buff, running marathons, etc. If she were a royal, I have no doubt she could keep up with any of the younger royals.
But forget about keeping up. As far as I know, there is no rule that I know of that states a royal has to be in perfect physical condition. Look at all the people we see everyday who are living full lives, making contributions who are physically disabled.
Remember President Roosevelt was in his fourth term as President- using a wheelchair to get around.
King Charles may have to cast a wider net to increase the numbers. Maybe there are some fringe royals who can be pressed into service. The other posters probably know who they are - they are related to him and at one time had titles, but I can't come up with any names.
The problem with focusing on the younger members of the royal family to pick up the slack is it's not clear to me how devoted they feel about dedicating their lives to public service. The newer generations are heavily influenced by a social media that touts "personal fulfillment", "find your bliss." Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm not so sure today's young royals would follow the late Queen's
example who, on her 21st birthday, made a vow to dedicate herself to her country and the Commonwealth.
297