Posted by Steven Prazak
on 10/4/2009, 11:46 am, in reply to "Re: What is wrong with Nashville Wrestling in General?"
Fair enough. But Wildside (and I imagine Anarchy) had a different M.O. than your Nashville groups in that they were there primarily to get these guys to the next stage - and not "dig me, I'm on TV". To be fair, I don't think the Wildside TV product did much to put 'butts in the seat' as they say, but did provide a forum in getting a handful of guys to a national theater - and many more to radically improve their in-ring craft, subsequently enhancing the quality of a young and upcoming talent pool. That unselfish line of thought sure seems far removed from the puppeteers of most Nashville groups, or at least that's the way I'm reading it.
Responses: