Posted by José
on 15/10/2009, 15:56:35, in reply to "Re: Micaela's first wedding"
213.22.205.128
--Previous Message--
: Princess Micaela's first husband is deceased
: for some/many years (don't know the exact
: date).
On this week PdV, Pss.Micaela's son Alexis Francis-Boeuf asks the magazine to correct a former information.
His father is alive !
So the question remains.
Was Micaela's 1st wedding just civil or did she get an anullement too ?
:
: Strange to me is that at the wedding of
: Prince Jean, it was already announced about
: a religious marriage in Biarritz by then,
: that both his father Prince Henri, Count of
: Paris, as his stepmother Princess Micaela,
: Countess of Paris, had a very prominent
: place in his wedding. Both even appeared on
: the stage for the reception in the garden of
: the old royal palace opposite the cathedral
: of Senlis and I saw that all of them were
: especially very happy. Very strange and sad
: that Prince Jean suddenly changed his mind.
:
:
:
: --Previous Message--
: Was Micaela Cousino first wedding religious
: or
: just civil ?
: If it was religious does anybody know when
: it was annulled.
: Leo's page just says she got married in 1961
: and divorced her 1st husband in 1966...
:
: --Previous Message--
: What surprises me if Henri only seeing some
: dynastical issues in Prince Jean's reaction.
: Certainly it has nothing to do with his
: father married a royal the first time and a
: commoner this one.
:
: --Previous Message--
: I guess the son is angree with the father
: because the father has not been very
: respectfull in the treatment of his mother.
: It's not unusual for children to choose
: sides in a divorce and it seems in the case
: of the count of Paris the children side with
: their mother the duchess of Montpensier. She
: fought the religious annulment of her
: marriage so the son reacting strongly
: against his father's second church marriage
: is not strange. Just unfortunate and like
: often with the Orléans-family very public.
:
: --Previous Message--
: Prince Jean's objections against his
: father's
: second marriage are a bit strange.
:
: First of all the second marriage has no any
: dynastical consequence since it will not
: bear any fruit, we may assume.
:
: Secondly the Prince is not in a position to
: object Micaela Cousiño y Quiñones de León
: because he has no any stance himself since
: his marriage to María Philomena de Tornos y
: Steinhart.'
:
: The Prince simply had to shut up and await
: his time. The Comte de Paris does look
: particularly frail and he has not the
: eternal life.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Message Thread:
« Back to thread