Re: Reigning and Non-reigning Royal Families

Posted by Charles on 3/3/2012, 9:20:36, in reply to "Re: Reigning and Non-reigning Royal Families"
User logged in as Charles
99.246.103.2

So do many non-royals. Obviously, we know this would be his numeral and he uses it to denote his dynastic position but he has not assumed the title of king. --Previous Message-- : But Alexander adds a post numerial after is : name ... : :

---

Message Thread Reigning and Non-reigning Royal Families - William F 25/2/2012, 4:19:12 Re: Reigning and Non-reigning Royal Families - Jane 25/2/2012, 19:01:55 Re: Reigning and Non-reigning Royal Families - José 25/2/2012, 19:44:46 Re: Reigning and Non-reigning Royal Families - William F 25/2/2012, 20:28:12 Re: Reigning and Non-reigning Royal Families - FrankS 3/3/2012, 8:33:52 Re: Reigning and Non-reigning Royal Families - Charles 3/3/2012, 9:20:36 Re: Reigning and Non-reigning Royal Families - manuel 25/2/2012, 20:10:53 Re: Reigning and Non-reigning Royal Families - William F 25/2/2012, 20:29:26 Re: Reigning and Non-reigning Royal Families - Charles 25/2/2012, 20:45:56 International Law - Gary 26/2/2012, 16:01:23 Re: International Law - Guy Stair Sainty 27/2/2012, 17:37:22 Re: International Law - William F 27/2/2012, 18:26:11 Re: International Law - José 28/2/2012, 18:13:20 Re: International Law - William F 28/2/2012, 20:25:14 Re: International Law - Guy Stair Sainty 28/2/2012, 21:48:57 Re: Reigning and Non-reigning Royal Families - Dan Willis 25/2/2012, 22:00:57 Re: Reigning and Non-reigning heads of state - Gary 26/2/2012, 16:06:47 Re: Reigning and Non-reigning heads of state - Joanna 5/3/2012, 14:36:52 Re: Reigning and Non-reigning heads of state - Gary 5/3/2012, 22:59:12 « Back to index

---

Post a response