Posted by Guy Stair Sainty
on 16/5/2011, 19:11:30, in reply to "Re: Bagrationi baby"
User logged in as GSS
85.171.161.125
Historically the throne several times passed to Queens, who married Bagration cousins, and several times it passed from the brother to brother rather than father to son. I do not believe one can reliably claim that male or mixed male priory and female primogeniture was securely established by 1801, when Georgia was incorporated into Russia.
--Previous Message--
: A boy might claim his right over the allready
: born daughters of Anne. However im not sure
: the Bagrations aknowledge a female line of
: succession.
: Still if he's the son of one pretender and
: the grandson of the other, who has no male
: heirs than it would help his claim i guess.
:
: --Previous Message--
: I wonder what the implication of this is in
: the light of the claim by Anne's father that
: he is the head of the royal house and not
: Prince Bagration.
:
: --Previous Message--
: According to an article in the Georgian
: press,
: Prince David Bagration-Mukhrani and Princess
: Anna Bagration-Gruzinsky are expecting their
: first child.
:
: The couple were married in February 2009
: with the blessing of the Georgian Patriarch.
: Stories of a separation surfaced that April,
: and by August 2009 the union was reportedly
: beyond repair. However, there has apparently
: been a reconciliation between the Prince and
: Princess, and they were photographed
: together in Switzerland either this year.
:
: Some associates of Prince David seem rather
: certain that the baby will be a boy.
:
: Source: Prime Time
:
:
:
:
:
:
Message Thread
« Back to index