Posted by Charles on 24/3/2011, 5:26:10, in reply to "Re: Plenty of political entities don't exist and titles are not changed"
User logged in as Charles
99.246.103.2
Well, his father was never King of Serbia. He can pretend to be its crown prince if he wants but that's not his real title.
--Previous Message--
: Yes, but the royal family of Yugoslavia was
: originally Serbian so with that state
: defunct it makes more sense for him to align
: himself with his Serbian roots.
:
: As Gary said, Alexander has a semi-official
: status in Serbia and it just would not serve
: his purpose as a representative of the
: Serbian people and monarchy if he was still
: hanging on to the "of Yugoslavia"
: designation.
:
: --Previous Message--
: Serbia was merged into Yugoslavia during the
: time of monarchy.
:
: --Previous Message--
: --Previous Message--
: True. But I don't blame Alexander for going
: back to his Serbian roots because he does
: have a better chance for a restoration by
: aligning himself that way.
:
: Yes. He is not only heir to the kings of
: Yugoslavia, but also to the Karadjordjovic
: kings of Serbia. Since both thrones are
: equally extinct, I hardly see what
: difference it makes to which he pretends.
:
: On the other hand, there is a Republic of
: Serbia and it does accord the Crown Prince a
: sort of semi-official status. In this sense
: he is more "of Serbia" than he is
: of the defunct Yugoslavia.
:
:
:
:
:
:
