Posted by M.Sjostrom on 4/11/2009, 14:48:48, in reply to "interesting new information on the Romanian RF by Marlene"
82.181.239.182

I observed that Koenig claims to be a genealogist. Her own written words to that effect were: "I am a royal genealogist....". Genealogy is an interesting field of research. 'Genealogist' -because it signals a science- as descriptor generally requires merits in solving relevant genealogical research questions. Conventionally, questions which are trivial, are not research questions. For example, in the field of genealogy, making routine lists of already known, solved genealogical connections, are not research questions. I gather the descendants of queen Victoria are already known, without any task of solving a non-trivial research problem. Listings of them are readily available - and there are no such identification puzzles which are actually solvable * by means of genealogy. I am wondering what are genealogical research questions which Koenig has thus far solved ? ------------------- * for example, the genealogically present, though peripherally genealogical question of an identification or non-identifiucation between 'Anastasia' Anderson and the real grand duchess, was not solvable by means of genealogy.... I think its solutions was found by help of biology, and genealogically it meant nothing - particularly as the woman in question had not produced issue.