Posted by M.Sjostrom on 30/10/2009, 20:27:55, in reply to "Re: Rostislav in Moscow"
82.181.239.182
okay, that speech from you tells that you are a supporter (quite blindly) of claims of Maria Vladimirovna,
and that indicates strongly that your original question was just a disingenuity, to get to present your convictions about the matter,
not that you actually would haave needed any substantial answer to that your question - as your position is already fixed.
Quite possibly Maria Vladimirovna is a product of a marriage which did not conform with the House Laws. its meaning: she then is not a dynast.
I do not have a fixed position about that matter.
I leave you with your 'religion' in this matter.
--Previous Message--
: I know people call themselves prince romanoff
: but the title does not legally exist to my
: knowledge.
: As for Maria Wladimirovna using the title of
: Grand Duchess that is not strange and equals
: the use of the title crownprince by
: Alexander of Serbia or Nicholas of
: Montenegro.
: As the present Head of the former reigning
: dynasty she could also call herself Tsarina
: or Empress like her father and grandfather
: before her she has opted for the title
: grandduchess.
:
: --Previous Message--
:
:
: you should already be aware of its history,
: as controversial as it is.
:
: I am simply using of them what they use.
: I am perfectly aware that they do not use
: 'Romanovski' as their surname, whatever some
: Maria Vladimirovna's supporters may want.
: On the other hand, Maria Vladimirovna uses
: the title 'Grand Duchess' of herself,
: whatever supporters of others may want....
:
: The question below either displays a
: profound ignorance of a relatively common
: knowledge about royalty
: or is intentional and disingenious.
:
:
:
:
: --Previous Message--
: How does he get the title prince Romanoff?
:
:
:
:
:
:
Message Thread:
« Back to thread