Posted by Lorenzo on 26/10/2009, 11:19:04, in reply to "papal titles"
82.106.247.152
Why do you say "Guy's" view?
It is perfectly logical that a civil marriage, that is not recognized by the Church as a legitimate marriage for people who are baptized, is not apt to transmit a title created under the rules of the Church. I am sure the applicable patents would state that clearly.
--Previous Message--
:
:
: the pope was legally and canonically
: perfectly capable of creating a papal title
: even to a person who was born an adulterous
: bastard. The legitimacy of birth was no
: fatal hinder for being the grantee - it's
: only the inheritance FROM the grantee which
: (in Guy's view) requires legitimacy.....
:
:
: --Previous Message--
:
:
:
: etc, most were hereditary, a few not; all
: however could only pass to the issue born of
: legitimate, Catholic marriages.
:
: ------
:
:
: Hmm? You mean, of the titles that were
: hereditary "all however could only pass
: to the issue born of legitimate, Catholic
: marriages"? Or do you man that titles
: that were given ad personam, such as the one
: to Rose Kennedy, could only be given if the
: person in question was born into a Catholic
: marriage (in other words, a convert could
: never become a papal count)?
:
: DTH
:
:
:
Message Thread:
« Back to thread