Posted by M.Sjöström on 26/10/2009, 11:08:09, in reply to "Re: Papal Princes"
Message modified by board administrator 26/10/2009, 11:25:04
the pope was legally and canonically perfectly capable of creating a papal title even to a person who was born an adulterous ***.
Please remember the ERMB rules. Derogatory expressions are not allowed. (The administrator)
The legitimacy of birth was no fatal hinder for being the grantee - it's only the inheritance FROM the grantee which (in Guy's view) requires legitimacy.....
--Previous Message--
:
: etc, most were hereditary, a few not; all
: however could only pass to the issue born of
: legitimate, Catholic marriages.
:
------
: Hmm? You mean, of the titles that were
: hereditary "all however could only pass
: to the issue born of legitimate, Catholic
: marriages"? Or do you man that titles
: that were given ad personam, such as the one
: to Rose Kennedy, could only be given if the
: person in question was born into a Catholic
: marriage (in other words, a convert could
: never become a papal count)?
:
: DTH
:
Message Thread:
« Back to thread