Posted by Marlene on 14/8/2009, 20:15:10, in reply to "Re: Marlene Koenig blog"
68.100.32.209
Of course, the story did not mention the count of barcelona. The article did not even mention mercedes or Juan .. my post was longer than the original news article.
I added that information.
--Previous Message--
: I have seen several mistakes in entries
: concerning the Spanish royal family, mainly
: about spelling, names and surnames and
: titles. Some have been accepted, others not
: and have even received unpolite answers,
: like "mind your own business". She
: usually says that the information came from
: an article and she has just transcribed it.
: Well, in her recent entry, dated in 1937,
: about Dolores of Borbon's wedding, she
: writes that the bride's sister, Maria de las
: Mercedes, is married to the Count of
: Barcelona. Well, this title was adopted in
: 1941. In 1937, Maria de las Mercedes was
: married to "Alfonso's son, the Prince
: of Asturias". I'm sure no paper, in
: 1937, had any idea about what title don Juan
: would adopt after his father's death.
: There are many other examples, but I have
: followed her indications and have decided to
: stop sending comments to the entries in her
: blog. Anyway, I will continue to visit it,
: because I find it interesting.
: Everybody makes mistakes, even though
: Marlene claims in the post above that
: "In all cases, I have not made a true
: mistake". Well, I think the last
: sentence in "some like it hot" is
: more accurate.
:
: --Previous Message--
:
: these behaviors of Marlene Koenig are good
: to know by those whom she now and then
: accuses of plagiarizing or stealing from
: herself.
:
: Marlene is sometimes unscrupulously using
: texts from others which correct her, as her
: own without any mention of the work of such
: others.
:
: Now I have observed that she also deletes
: from her pages comments from others,
: comments which already were for a time
: public there - and makes occasionally things
: look like she worked those out by herself.
:
:
: --Previous Message--
: Even better - do not read the blog -- I am
: going to start a new policy - if you don't
: sign your name to a post - you won't get
: your comment posted. No more anonymous
: responses.
:
: In all cases, I have not made a true mistake
: -but as I sometimes type fast, I make stupid
: errors especially when I write at night.
:
: But I wish you would not waist yor tyme
: reeding mi blog.
:
:
:
: --Previous Message--
: What's the big deal? If you find an an error
: on Marlene's Blog you just post a suitable
: comment on her site and the error will get
: corrected. I find it a little difficult to
: understand the reason for this new thread.
:
: Allan Raymond
:
:
: --Previous Message--
:
: I got to experience that Marlene Koenig uses
: corrections made by others, without
: according any credit to those who provide
: such.
:
: That said, as seen, she makes frequently
: mistakes which would be inexplicable, were
: one to be well knowledgeable about royalty.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Message Thread:
![]()
« Back to thread

Responses are not allowed!
Create your own free message board!