Posted by M.Sjostrom on 11/6/2009, 9:57:15, in reply to "Re: weddings of Albert's sons"
82.181.239.182
does this mean that you do not have an explanation why the 'prince of Liege' title is not present in that document
- contrary to what you claimed ?
The quibbling about 'Belgium's monarchy is not feudal' does not help in that. The title 'prince of Liege' appears vanished, if that document is correct
--Previous Message--
: You again refer to feudal practice. The
: Belgian monarchy isn't feudal. They don't
: have practices that are normal to other
: monarchies.
:
: --Previous Message--
:
:
: --Previous Message--
:
: you claim that Albert still holds the title
: 'prince of Liege'. How do you then explain
: that the Liege title is absent from this
: government text?
: http://members3.boardhost.com/EuropeanRoyals/msg/1244637511.html
:
Message Thread:
![]()
« Back to thread