Posted by José on 13/5/2008, 22:14:02, in reply to "Re: Renunciation of rights"
83.132.161.11
Interesting story.
I've never heard of it before.
What kind of constitutional changes were made that upset so much the Pr. of Orange ?
--Previous Message--
: I have never heard anyone with the slightest
: bit of constitutional knowledge state that a
: Dutch heir can renounce his rights.
: As stated there are ways to get out of the
: line of succession, just not single
: handedly.
: Any book on the constitution will explain
: the articles concerning the succession as
: something one cannot renounce.
: The European courts could see that as
: opposing the Human rights but as long as no
: heir(ess) has started a legal suite that is
: pure speculation from my part.
:
: --Previous Message--
:
:
: --Previous Message--
: A Dutch heir(ess) to the throne cannot
: renounce his/her rights
:
: Yes, I have seen this claim being made
: repeatedly. There is a parallel to the
: Norweigan constitution in this regard, but
: it seems the texts are interpreted
: differently. I am not saying that the common
: interpretation repeated here is not correct,
: but could you please refer to scholars who
: agree with the common interpretation that a
: Dutch heir(ess) to the throne cannot
: renounce his/her rights, and are there any
: scholars who disagree?
:
: DTH
:
:
:
Message Thread:
« Back to thread