Posted by William F on 9/5/2008, 20:03:01, in reply to "Re: Definitions of Royalty"
66.67.27.241
So there is nor real definition of who is royal or not and maybe the definition is different from country to country?
Do you consider the Grand Dukes of Luxembourg royal?
--Previous Message--
:
: to avoid that very debate, the great and
: opinionated conversation about
: terminological limitations of the word
: 'royal', usually I have empolyed the term
: monarch when I have needed to cover a larger
: variety of things, well, things
: monarchical...
:
: Afaik the Gotha I section itself does not
: claim those all families being royal...
:
:
:
: --Previous Message--
: How do you define royalty then? I tend to
: have
: a broader definition of royalty and consider
: all those families in section 1 of the Gotha
: as royal.
:
: --Previous Message--
:
: I do not regard Monaco as royal, sorry. Not
: even their titulary nor styles do make any
: claim of being royalty.
:
: The Monegasque princely glitter belongs to
: its proper place in larger picture of
: things, as fascinating as its operetta might
: be.
:
: Whereas, I believe, Sophia of Bavaria seems
: to be a HRH, and certainly the fantastic
: kingdoms of England, Scotland, (France,) and
: Ireland, are royal ones
:
:
:
: --Previous Message--
: "Curiously enough, the late princess
: Diana was not the ONLY mother of prominent
: European royals with roots in America."
:
: Only ?
: Does the name Grace Kelly ring a bell ?
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
