Posted by Irn12 on 10/5/2005, 2:20 pm, in reply to "Re: Not really" You can't stand back and bad mouth the other side by saying they have no right to stand up and protest this. You're doing what MSL said, condemning one side while doing the same thing you accuse them of. : Well, the Religious Right has been known to That's funny when it was the evolutionists that will not join the debate. Again, your side says lets hear science unless we disagree, then they don't get a say. Who's protecting who from science. Yeah, I'd like to see those statistics. : And while you're discoursing on suicide If there is merit it in them as religions, then be up front that they are religions instead of foistering them on children as innocenct cartoons. Or is deception one of those merits. Your telling me the Jewish and Muslims don't have a problem with witchcraft. I don't think so, their religions condemns them, soundly. And who was a major voice against The Passion of the Christ. : Their incessent need? They can put out anything they think will make them some money. And I'd say the they go out of their way to do just that. Owning a network, publishing, Movie studio, I'd say they've positioned themselves to be a powerful force in America and the world. : Oh please. The problem is we're talking about what you don't want the "right" to do. Think. They have to have your thoughts, support you're products, religions, gods, if not then they have to shut up and take it. This is just a ridiculous statement that history proves wrong and is just uninformed. : And so reminiscent of what the Right Wing The Government legislates morality already, every law is a legislation of morality, or don't you care if someone steals from you. The right's position is less government, the left's position is more government and more government control. : I mean, c'mon. The Religious Right makes no What law has the right passed that forces you to obey their religion? This country is for both "the right" and "the left." They both have the right to organize and protest. They both have a say. The arguement here is your side saying christians don't have this right. My side is saying we both have this right. Who is more inclusive. : How they want to MAKE everyone obey, Again name calling. Your side can't seem to stand someone with a different opinion, that is more related to the name who so brazenly throw around.
68.102.91.129
The problem with this statement is that it is false in and of itself. From your perspective, they may go to far, but they have a right to organize and protest just as you would that is not going too far.
: go a little too far - while there may be a
: legitimate point in their protest of
: W.I.T.C.H. and/or Harry Potter and/or other
: non-Christian-theme products?
: They also seem to see the need to protect
: them from science.
:
: You have a market scheme that aimed at kids
: over a subject that has a high rate of
: suicide and self harm, the occult.
: rates, check the ones of the children of the
: religeous right who happen to be gay, or
: some other thing considered "deviant
: and sinful".
: Oh, and God forbid - pun not intended - that
: there might be some merit in the
: Wiccan/Pagan religions - not that they'll
: discover it through Harry Potter or WITCH,
: which are so short on any real occultism as
: to be laughable.
: Any correlation drawn between WITCH and
: anything but light entertainment is pretty
: far-fetched.
:
: Not that I hold the extreme Left in any
: greater esteem - the operative word being
: "extreme".
:
: Absolutely. You don't see anyone else - the
: United Jewish League, the Islamic Council,
: or somesuch constantly protesting Christian
: Power Comics and their pro-Christian
: message?
:
: So, when adults want to protect their own
: children, they have to shut up while Disney
: FORCES their merchandise on the public.
:
: Disney may have lots of money, but they have
: produced enough absolute disasters that it
: should be apparent to anyone that they can't
: force anything. Crap Disney product rots on
: the shelf. Period.
:
: This public can't speak up, in your opinion.
: They have to go hide their head in the
: corner and not take part of the public
: debate, which Disney made public.
:
: Now that population can't watch movies,
: speak against immorality, protect their own
: children. Why? Because you disagree with
: their thoughts, so they have to go live in a
: cave. That is narrow-minded prejudice at
: its worst.
: demands of their constituency - don't
: question. Obey.
: bones about how they want the government to
: legislate morality in accord with their own
: narrow precepts.
: regardless of their own personal religious
: convictions.
: There are many - many many many! -
: Christians and Christian organizations whose
: words and acts would make me proud to be
: numbered amongst them - but the
: "Religeous Reich" isn't among
: them.
:
: And um... he said that it was amusing (in a
: disturbing kind of way) to watch the RR run
: around screaming "the Sky Is
: Falling" about something as trivial in
: general as Disney product, and in particular
: the exceptionally lightweight W.I.T.C.H.
