Posted by TheGoof! on 10/1/2005, 3:43 am, in reply to "That's kind of harsh and close minded, don't you think?" Disney is a wonderful avenue for creative outlet and recreational pleasure whether viewing or enjoyaing the themeparks or merchandise, etc.. Maybe they should look in their own backyard and leave others alone. I'm just noting the latest target o their wrath.
171.66.213.131
Calling them Zealots is quite appropriate. But I do get a kick out of their incessant need to find Disney as one of their constant threats to the proliferation of their FORCED belief system. It is also amusing, as you point out, how they love to hide behind a mask of "protecting" children as the impetus of the need to attack. But still enjoyable to see when it constantly crops up. :-)
--Previous Message--
: After all people's religion is important to
: them and their children, especially a wiccan
: religion that goes directly against many
: Christian (biblical) concepts. So, I would
: think that parents would have the right to
: be upset if they felt someone was sugar
: coating a religion to their kids.
:
: Disney has a right to publish their ideas
: and people have a right to condemn those
: ideas. I don't think name calling is
: appropriate, though.
:
: --Previous Message--
: I just KNEW there would be an uproar when
: the
: Religious Reich discovered W.I.T.C.H.
:
:
:
: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38688
:
: In the above article, the author asks, Is
: "Disney leading kids to hell?
: New book series W.I.T.C.H. pushes
: witchcraft, astrology"
:
: LOL! The religious fundamentalist
: right-wing fanatics are ALWAYS looking for
: another angle to say that Disney is a tool
: of the Devil!!! Gotta love it! LOL!
: -The Goof!
:
:
:
:
This website, its operator, and any content contained on this site relating to Disney Company characters are not authorized by the Disney Company. This site is not sponsored, approved or authorized by the Disney Company. The opinions of this site are not necessarily those of the Disney Company and this site is not an authoratative voice of the views of Disney Animated and Comicbook characters and situations as written by Disney Comics. This site serves as a non-profit scholarly work which reviews, promotes, and documents the elements of "Disney Animated and Comics characters" in comic books and other media during the 20th century and beyond. All ideas in this site are expressed as a continuation of thought covering the pop culture associated with related Disney characters.
*contest question*--What was Mickey Mouse's first film appearance and in what year did it debut?
These thoughts are not necessarily the ideas of the Disney Company. Some illustrations and words are the creation of others that may or may not have appeared in other publications or websites. Their inclusion in this site is not intended as an infringement of their copyright in any way, but rather is done in the interest of documenting and reviewing pieces of pop culture "comic book" and "animation" history.
MICKEY MOUSE, DONALD DUCK, GOOFY, PINOCCHIO, THE LION KING, BUZZ LIGHTYEAR, GARGOYLES, DUCKTALES, UNCLE SCROOGE, and other related properties and images are ?928-2001 by Disney. Characters from TARZAN are licensed property from the Edgar Rice Burroughs estate. Characters from TOY STORY, TOY STORY II, A BUGS LIFE and MONSTERS INC. are co-owned property of Disney and Pixar. Characters related to ROGER RABBIT are co-licensed by Disney and Amblin and are owned by Gary Wolf. Characters from GREMLINS and JAMES AND THE GIANT PEACH were created by Roald Dahl and were lisenced by Disney. JAMES AND THE GIANT PEACH, THE NIGHTMARE BEFORE CHRISTMAS and VINCENT were produced/owned by Tim Burton. Other properties, where noted, were also licensed by Disney and are presented here for discussion purposes only.