Re: Brian's Post
Posted by Steve Szupka
on October 11, 2006, 7:42 pm, in reply to "Re: Brian's Post"
205.188.116.136|
Dom, that is not the main reason. The reason is because there is a class to run, B/A. If you are testing for Pro Stock then just go test somewhere or yes, suck it up and run A/A and not be very far under the index. I am a firm believer in no new classes. How there are 80 some classes already and somebody can't find something to run is beyond me. I consider Mike and Pam my friends but I do not support auto dragster classes. It is nothing personal against them and I have told them that. I hope you are true in saying that you will be in D and E/A next year or run B/A, B/AA, or B/AP. Div 1 has had some good car counts this year and the more cars the better New classes are not going to bring in new cars, they are justing going to re-shuffle the existing cars that are already out there and more than likely create another bogus index. Case in point AA/SM. No new cars, just guys who can spend the money to jump on it right away to take advantage of NHRA's mistake.
|
|
Message Thread | Skip to this response ↓
- 4.7lb comp class/Support letters - John Mahoney September 20, 2006, 8:38 pm
- Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - John Mahoney September 21, 2006, 11:14 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Shane Heckel October 3, 2006, 5:23 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Clint Neff 590 A/ED October 3, 2006, 6:10 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Craig Bourgeois October 3, 2006, 6:56 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Shane Heckel October 3, 2006, 7:02 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Richie Rosen October 3, 2006, 8:28 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - John Mahoney October 4, 2006, 12:26 am
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Richie Rosen October 4, 2006, 9:35 am
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Clint Neff 590 A/ED October 4, 2006, 10:09 am
- I think tired is a more appropriate term... - Ray Vierheller October 4, 2006, 10:17 am
- Re: I think tired is a more appropriate term... - Richie Rosen October 4, 2006, 10:52 am
- Nice Post... - Dan October 7, 2006, 11:41 am
- OK...here we go! - Ray Vierheller October 9, 2006, 11:40 am
- There you go again... - Dan October 9, 2006, 12:41 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - dave ring October 9, 2006, 1:48 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - Dom Coccia October 9, 2006, 6:27 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - scott chamberlain October 9, 2006, 7:05 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - Shane Heckel October 9, 2006, 7:09 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - Brian Landies October 9, 2006, 11:05 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - Dom Coccia October 10, 2006, 7:21 am
- Re: OK...here we go! - Erich Bollman October 10, 2006, 7:57 am
- Re: OK...here we go! - Ray Vierheller October 10, 2006, 9:42 am
- Re: OK...here we go! - Shane Heckel October 10, 2006, 9:57 am
- Ray - Clint Neff 590 Top Fuel Auto October 10, 2006, 10:38 am
- Re: Ray - Ray Vierheller October 10, 2006, 10:44 am
- Re: Ray - Erich Bollman October 10, 2006, 11:46 am
- Re: Ray - Clint Neff 590 Top Fuel Auto October 10, 2006, 12:00 pm
- Re: Ray - Shane Heckel/crybaby October 10, 2006, 1:53 pm
- Re: Ray - Clint Neff 590 Top Fuel Auto October 10, 2006, 2:40 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - Charlie Greco October 10, 2006, 6:39 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - John Mahoney October 10, 2006, 9:48 pm
- Thank you for not forgetting about me... - Dan October 11, 2006, 6:48 pm
« Back to index
|
