Re: Brian's Post
Posted by Steve Szupka
on October 11, 2006, 6:05 pm, in reply to "Re: Brian's Post"
205.188.116.136|
Danny, the reason is perfectly clear. YOU ALREADY HAVE A CLASS THAT A PRO STOCKER CAN RUN, IT IS B/A!!!!! Why can't run run B/A? You are running it now anyway. If you want to run 500" then make the car weigh 2700. Even if the index is fair, WHY DO YOU NEED ANOTHER CLASS! You are not a any disadvantage in B/A. Thank you Ed Bennett for posting that earlier response. Look how fast he was a few years ago. Brad Klein did it, Randy Jones and Hans Mogensen did it several years ago. You, Dom and John and any other Pro Stock car can too if they wish. Ed made an excellent point. What if someome justs tests engines for Morgan, Schimdt, etc and crushes the index? You guys will be right back in B/A. If you are in B/A now, why do you need this class anyway? The are bigger issues in Comp than this. Open the rulebook, pick a class, build a car for that class, and work on your stuff to make it faster. NO NEW CLASSES! The system works so leave it be.
|
|
Message Thread | Skip to this response ↓
- 4.7lb comp class/Support letters - John Mahoney September 20, 2006, 8:38 pm
- Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - John Mahoney September 21, 2006, 11:14 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Shane Heckel October 3, 2006, 5:23 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Clint Neff 590 A/ED October 3, 2006, 6:10 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Craig Bourgeois October 3, 2006, 6:56 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Shane Heckel October 3, 2006, 7:02 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Richie Rosen October 3, 2006, 8:28 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - John Mahoney October 4, 2006, 12:26 am
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Richie Rosen October 4, 2006, 9:35 am
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Clint Neff 590 A/ED October 4, 2006, 10:09 am
- I think tired is a more appropriate term... - Ray Vierheller October 4, 2006, 10:17 am
- Re: I think tired is a more appropriate term... - Richie Rosen October 4, 2006, 10:52 am
- Nice Post... - Dan October 7, 2006, 11:41 am
- OK...here we go! - Ray Vierheller October 9, 2006, 11:40 am
- There you go again... - Dan October 9, 2006, 12:41 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - dave ring October 9, 2006, 1:48 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - Dom Coccia October 9, 2006, 6:27 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - scott chamberlain October 9, 2006, 7:05 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - Shane Heckel October 9, 2006, 7:09 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - Brian Landies October 9, 2006, 11:05 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - Dom Coccia October 10, 2006, 7:21 am
- Re: OK...here we go! - Erich Bollman October 10, 2006, 7:57 am
- Re: OK...here we go! - Ray Vierheller October 10, 2006, 9:42 am
- Re: OK...here we go! - Shane Heckel October 10, 2006, 9:57 am
- Ray - Clint Neff 590 Top Fuel Auto October 10, 2006, 10:38 am
- Re: Ray - Ray Vierheller October 10, 2006, 10:44 am
- Re: Ray - Erich Bollman October 10, 2006, 11:46 am
- Re: Ray - Clint Neff 590 Top Fuel Auto October 10, 2006, 12:00 pm
- Re: Ray - Shane Heckel/crybaby October 10, 2006, 1:53 pm
- Re: Ray - Clint Neff 590 Top Fuel Auto October 10, 2006, 2:40 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - Charlie Greco October 10, 2006, 6:39 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - John Mahoney October 10, 2006, 9:48 pm
- Re: Brian's Post - Frank Aragona Jr. October 10, 2006, 10:20 pm
- Re: Brian's Post - John Mahoney October 11, 2006, 12:07 am
- Re: Brian's Post - Ed Bennett III October 11, 2006, 8:22 am
- Re: Brian's Post - Frank Aragona Jr October 11, 2006, 8:56 am
- Re: Brian's Post - Vinny Barone A/SR 106 October 11, 2006, 9:29 am
- Re: Brian's Post - Charles Tanksley October 11, 2006, 10:54 am
- Re: Brian's Post - Danny Gruninger October 11, 2006, 1:55 pm
- Re: Brian's Post - Steve Szupka October 11, 2006, 6:05 pm
- Thank you for not forgetting about me... - Dan October 11, 2006, 6:48 pm
 « Back to index
|