Re: Why most people dont want new classes.
Posted by Miskovsky Racing
on October 11, 2006, 10:44 am, in reply to "Why most people dont want new classes."
205.245.187.130|
Shane, You have made a very good point!! I believe that NHRA should include the racers in determining the indexes for new classes that are created. It surely would created less anomosity among the racers and phone calls and emails to NHRA. There are a lot of racers that have experience in other types of racing that can help to make the indexes more accurate from the get go. Part of the reason NHRA probably would not want to do this is because there are people that can not look at this topic logically. I believe that Comp should not stop where it is at since Comp is a technology class and technology continuously moves forward. For the belief of new classes not being wanted, I do see the point of others that there are to many already. Many could be combined such as ALL the automatic classes/ stick classes. NHRA would just need to determine a FAIR weight break. Pam
|
|
Message Thread | Skip to this response ↓
- 4.7lb comp class/Support letters - John Mahoney September 20, 2006, 8:38 pm
- Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - John Mahoney September 21, 2006, 11:14 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Shane Heckel October 3, 2006, 5:23 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Clint Neff 590 A/ED October 3, 2006, 6:10 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Craig Bourgeois October 3, 2006, 6:56 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Shane Heckel October 3, 2006, 7:02 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Richie Rosen October 3, 2006, 8:28 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - John Mahoney October 4, 2006, 12:26 am
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Richie Rosen October 4, 2006, 9:35 am
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Clint Neff 590 A/ED October 4, 2006, 10:09 am
- I think tired is a more appropriate term... - Ray Vierheller October 4, 2006, 10:17 am
- Re: I think tired is a more appropriate term... - Richie Rosen October 4, 2006, 10:52 am
- Nice Post... - Dan October 7, 2006, 11:41 am
- OK...here we go! - Ray Vierheller October 9, 2006, 11:40 am
- There you go again... - Dan October 9, 2006, 12:41 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - dave ring October 9, 2006, 1:48 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - Dom Coccia October 9, 2006, 6:27 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - scott chamberlain October 9, 2006, 7:05 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - Shane Heckel October 9, 2006, 7:09 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - Brian Landies October 9, 2006, 11:05 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - Dom Coccia October 10, 2006, 7:21 am
- Re: OK...here we go! - Erich Bollman October 10, 2006, 7:57 am
- Re: OK...here we go! - Ray Vierheller October 10, 2006, 9:42 am
- Re: OK...here we go! - Shane Heckel October 10, 2006, 9:57 am
- Ray - Clint Neff 590 Top Fuel Auto October 10, 2006, 10:38 am
- Re: Ray - Ray Vierheller October 10, 2006, 10:44 am
- Re: Ray - Erich Bollman October 10, 2006, 11:46 am
- Re: Ray - Clint Neff 590 Top Fuel Auto October 10, 2006, 12:00 pm
- Re: Ray - Shane Heckel/crybaby October 10, 2006, 1:53 pm
- Re: Ray - Clint Neff 590 Top Fuel Auto October 10, 2006, 2:40 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - Charlie Greco October 10, 2006, 6:39 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - John Mahoney October 10, 2006, 9:48 pm
- Thank you for not forgetting about me... - Dan October 11, 2006, 6:48 pm
« Back to index
|
