Re: Pro Stock in Comp?
Posted by Danny


on October 4, 2006, 12:04 pm, in reply to "Pro Stock in Comp?"
216.38.196.235|
Comp Elim is a SPORTSMAN class....An easy fix to this problem is by making a rule that if you run so many, lets say 10 pro races or more per season you are not elibible to run in comp. This would keep the huge budget teams out and give the guys with a smaller budget to run. And by small, we all know putting together one of these cars is not cheap. I'd venture to say we have more in our newly updated b/a combo than 80 percent of the guys in comp. New Cobalt, new engine, clutches, trans....I know we sure as hell wouldnt be "using the stuff laying around in our garage" to run this class.
|
|
Message Thread | Skip to this response ↓
- 4.7lb comp class/Support letters - John Mahoney September 20, 2006, 8:38 pm
- Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - John Mahoney September 21, 2006, 11:14 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Shane Heckel October 3, 2006, 5:23 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Clint Neff 590 A/ED October 3, 2006, 6:10 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Craig Bourgeois October 3, 2006, 6:56 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Shane Heckel October 3, 2006, 7:02 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Richie Rosen October 3, 2006, 8:28 pm
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - John Mahoney October 4, 2006, 12:26 am
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Richie Rosen October 4, 2006, 9:35 am
- Re: Thank you for your support keep them comming!! - Clint Neff 590 A/ED October 4, 2006, 10:09 am
- I think tired is a more appropriate term... - Ray Vierheller October 4, 2006, 10:17 am
- Re: I think tired is a more appropriate term... - Richie Rosen October 4, 2006, 10:52 am
- Nice Post... - Dan October 7, 2006, 11:41 am
- OK...here we go! - Ray Vierheller October 9, 2006, 11:40 am
- There you go again... - Dan October 9, 2006, 12:41 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - dave ring October 9, 2006, 1:48 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - Dom Coccia October 9, 2006, 6:27 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - scott chamberlain October 9, 2006, 7:05 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - Shane Heckel October 9, 2006, 7:09 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - Brian Landies October 9, 2006, 11:05 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - Dom Coccia October 10, 2006, 7:21 am
- Re: OK...here we go! - Erich Bollman October 10, 2006, 7:57 am
- Re: OK...here we go! - Ray Vierheller October 10, 2006, 9:42 am
- Re: OK...here we go! - Shane Heckel October 10, 2006, 9:57 am
- Ray - Clint Neff 590 Top Fuel Auto October 10, 2006, 10:38 am
- Re: Ray - Ray Vierheller October 10, 2006, 10:44 am
- Re: Ray - Erich Bollman October 10, 2006, 11:46 am
- Re: Ray - Clint Neff 590 Top Fuel Auto October 10, 2006, 12:00 pm
- Re: Ray - Shane Heckel/crybaby October 10, 2006, 1:53 pm
- Re: Ray - Clint Neff 590 Top Fuel Auto October 10, 2006, 2:40 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - Charlie Greco October 10, 2006, 6:39 pm
- Re: OK...here we go! - John Mahoney October 10, 2006, 9:48 pm
- Thank you for not forgetting about me... - Dan October 11, 2006, 6:48 pm
 « Back to index
|