[ Post a Response | Bessemer and Lake Erie Messageboard ]

Re: Revisiting "discredited" technology

Posted by Paul Stumpff on February 24, 2012, 1:20 pm, in reply to "Re: Revisiting "discredited" technology"
173.188.126.171

I believe that the fly ash could be introduced when throttle closed and the ensuing vacuum that would be created in turbine would drawback flyash from stack. Coal fired gas turbines were looked at but definitely had a fly ash problem.

---

Message Thread Revisiting "discredited" technology - penn senseless January 30, 2012, 4:54 pm Re: Revisiting "discredited" technology - radivil January 31, 2012, 12:59 am Re: Revisiting "discredited" technology - penn senseless January 31, 2012, 4:37 pm Re: Revisiting "discredited" technology - BLE Bob January 31, 2012, 8:14 am Re: Revisiting "discredited" technology - penn senseless January 30, 2012, 4:57 pm Re: Revisiting "discredited" technology - Todd January 30, 2012, 7:58 pm Re: Revisiting "discredited" technology - penn senseless January 31, 2012, 4:42 pm Re: Revisiting "discredited" technology - Todd January 31, 2012, 11:40 pm Re: Revisiting "discredited" technology - Paul Stumpff February 3, 2012, 11:19 am Re: Revisiting "discredited" technology - radivil February 3, 2012, 11:41 pm Re: Revisiting "discredited" technology - Paul Stumpff February 4, 2012, 1:21 pm Re: Revisiting "discredited" technology - Paul Stumpff February 11, 2012, 11:34 am Re: Revisiting "discredited" technology - Todd February 11, 2012, 6:19 pm Re: Revisiting "discredited" technology - C Timko February 11, 2012, 8:32 am Re: Revisiting "discredited" technology - Paul Stumpff February 11, 2012, 11:42 am Re: Revisiting "discredited" technology - kleetus92 February 23, 2012, 1:24 am Re: Revisiting "discredited" technology - Paul Stumpff February 24, 2012, 1:20 pm Re: Revisiting "discredited" technology - Todd February 24, 2012, 5:21 pm Re: Revisiting "discredited" technology - Todd February 23, 2012, 11:36 am « Back to index

---

Post a Response