Re: Not Margriet but Michiko...

Posted by Karen on 17/10/2009, 21:40:58, in reply to "Re: Not Margriet but Michiko..."
77.99.97.248

Whoops I gave her birth month and year instead of her wedding date, sorry. They married on 21 March 1871. That's what I get for trying to type quickly and not concentrating and checking what I was typing

---

Message Thread: Not Margriet but Michiko... - joris 17/10/2009, 20:29:30 Since when? - Jane 19/10/2009, 6:15:00 Re: Not Margriet but Michiko... - Rachel in IN 17/10/2009, 20:47:51 Re: Not Margriet but Michiko... - Karen 17/10/2009, 21:36:49 Re: Not Margriet but Michiko... - Jorge 18/10/2009, 0:05:23 Re: Not Margriet but Michiko... - Karen 17/10/2009, 21:40:58 Re: Not Margriet but Michiko... - joris 17/10/2009, 21:47:21 Re: Not Margriet but Michiko... - joris 17/10/2009, 21:31:50 Re: Not Margriet but Michiko... - Cynthia 17/10/2009, 21:37:47 Re: Not Margriet but Michiko... - Kat 17/10/2009, 22:23:34 Re: Not Margriet but Michiko... - Damian 18/10/2009, 0:46:53 Re: Not Margriet but Michiko... - Kat 18/10/2009, 13:20:36 Re: Not Margriet but Michiko... - Johan 18/10/2009, 9:47:33 Re: Not Margriet but Michiko... - joris 18/10/2009, 9:52:41 Re: Not Margriet but Michiko... - Johan 18/10/2009, 12:32:45 Re: Not Margriet but Michiko... - Stig 18/10/2009, 10:13:43 Re: Not Margriet but Michiko... - Martin T 18/10/2009, 13:50:43 Re: Not Margriet but Michiko... - Stig 18/10/2009, 17:57:10 Re: Not Margriet but Michiko... - Eric VdV 18/10/2009, 15:46:57 Re: Not Margriet but Michiko... - José 20/10/2009, 18:25:02 « Back to thread

---

Post a Response