Posted by JH
on 14/10/2009, 17:10:42, in reply to "Re: private (royal) travel expenses "
82.170.78.115
More frugal?This present mannenbroeders set?The calvinist set?They invented frugal.
--Previous Message--
: It think it's no more than logical that all
: the expenses made from taxpayers' money are
: carefully weighed. So if money could be
: safed by ministers being a bit more frugal
: that should also be done. This is however a
: board about Royalty so im concentrating on
: their expenses and their behaviour.
:
:
: --Previous Message--
: And what to think of a government minister
: or
: state secretary with an urge for verbal
: diarrhea to make una bella figura
: abroad?They all fly the KBX,that thing makes
: more hours for them then they spend working
: themselves.Or they use that other jet they
: purchased a few years ago and has more costs
: on repairs then it has flying.
:
: Travel expenses.My foot.A non-issue as the
: real costs are not made by the RF as you
: will see if you delve in the costs the
: government makes and was all of that
: necessary when they did?..Nah...
:
: Nah,they would have another thing a-coming
: if I had a say in it.But I enjoy my peace
: and quiet...
: that's why I settle with the Boards only...
:
: --Previous Message--
: So why were those expenses still so high
: last
: year when they can fly for free with KLM?
: I don't see why private travel needs to be
: paid for by anyone else than those doing the
: travelling. The Queen, the prince and his
: wife all three have a state income that
: exceeds their work-related expenses. That is
: their private income. That part of their
: income is to cover their private expenses
: and private travel should be included in
: that.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Message Thread:
« Back to thread