Posted by JH
on 14/10/2009, 3:28:22, in reply to "Re: Don Fulco Ruffo di Calabria, father of Queen Paola"
82.170.78.115
I do blame the messenger,the paper,they should do their homework better to but with heavy dwindling numbers of papers sold,they try anything to make an extra buck too.
People gather the news more and more from the web.Hence.The author,if one can use this word for one writing pulp and trying to get old news in a smelly coat of " fascism",the author doesn't deserve that predicate.It's a Belske with braindamage.
--Previous Message--
: Do you really think people actually buy hard
: copy newspapers because of this old news
: which isn't even on the frontpage? How would
: they know (unless they would read the
: newspaper at the newsstand?). Don't blame
: the messenger, the newspaper, but the
: author of the book. Newspapers publish
: about the release of books, including this
: one. The customer should decide if it's
: worth while to buy/read. It's only
: praiseworthy that they don't pretend they
: have the right of censorship with regard to
: publications.
:
: Some read the news in a hard copy form, some
: on the internet. Are the internet news
: providers seen as "selling" their
: products? We read this here: on the
: internet. Free. We don't buy Het Laatste
: Nieuws but know about the content of the
: article... Reading the news on the internet
: would be as bad as buying a newspaper then.
: I bet that the internet readers are more
: eager to read all this than the actual
: newspaper buyers. Especially Het Laatste
: Nieuws readers are NOT the readers who'd be
: interested in the Belgian monarchy.
:
: