Ask Joanne: Two Things Today

Ask Joanne
[ Post a Response | Ask Joanne ]

Two Things Today

Posted by Real Deal on October 29, 2009, 11:02 am, in reply to "Caveat emptor"

"Argue with that." That's your response, please JB let's stop this now. I apologized for my contribution yesterday and I apologized to the board Curious and Ayzkika and now you. Move on. I trust you will benefit others here that are in need of your support and friendship.

I am committed to two things today...One. Not scrumming with you or the board. Two. Cleaning my home, shopping, preping. So argue that.

Best.
RD

--Previous Message--
: --Previous Message--
: "Withholding potentially transformative
: information (including opinions) from people
: is a form of abuse" Only if they ask or
: want that information. Otherwise, it becomes
: stuffing it down women's throats.
:
: You can't stuff anything down a woman's
: throat if she isn't PRESENT.
:
: Online, the act of clicking on, opening and
: reading a post IS the act of asking for
: information from that particular poster. I
: think you're forgetting that key point.
:
: The content of the threads and individual
: posts on AJ are HIDDEN unless the user
: actively engages in clicking, opening and
: reading the information therein.
:
: Argue with that.
:
: JB
:
:
:

Message Thread:

I'm Gulity Too. I Recognize I Didn't Add to the Solution. - Real Deal October 29, 2009, 9:48 am
- Re: I'm Gulity Too. I Recognize I Didn't Add to the Solution. - Portia October 29, 2009, 10:00 am
- Veiled? Not really LARGELY EDITED - JB October 29, 2009, 10:05 am
  - NO censorship... - tinganting October 29, 2009, 10:13 am
    - the problem is - ontheotherside October 29, 2009, 10:45 am
      - The level of paranoia and grandiosity here - ayzika October 30, 2009, 7:17 am
  - Re: Veiled? Not really - Real Deal October 29, 2009, 10:29 am
    - Caveat emptor - JB October 29, 2009, 10:36 am
      - Two Things Today - Real Deal October 29, 2009, 11:02 am
        
        Fair enough, friend. - JB October 29, 2009, 11:17 am
        
        Re: Fair enough, friend. - Real Deal October 29, 2009, 11:34 am
  - Re: Veiled? Not really LARGELY EDITED - Joanne Fleisher October 29, 2009, 3:09 pm
  - Re: Veiled? Not really LARGELY EDITED - Sasha1 October 29, 2009, 5:27 pm
    - Sasha: What about this? - JB October 29, 2009, 5:41 pm
      - not to mention - ayzika October 30, 2009, 8:19 am
        
        Re: not to mention - ontheotherside October 30, 2009, 8:52 am
        
        yes, OTOS - ayzika October 30, 2009, 9:00 am
        
        Re: not to mention - Sasha1 October 30, 2009, 9:22 am
        
        but, this is what i don't understand - curious October 30, 2009, 9:52 am
        
        Re: but, this is what i don't understand - Sasha1 October 30, 2009, 10:38 am
        
        Re: but, this is what i don't understand - ayzika October 30, 2009, 10:49 am
        
        thank you for your response - curious October 30, 2009, 10:53 am
        
        additionally, curious - ayzika October 30, 2009, 11:00 am
        
        Re: additionally, curious - Sasha1 October 30, 2009, 11:04 am
        
        agree - curious October 30, 2009, 11:04 am
        
        Re: thank you for your response - Sasha1 October 30, 2009, 11:02 am
        
        i think - curious October 30, 2009, 11:29 am
        
        Re: i think - Sasha1 October 30, 2009, 11:44 am
        
        really - curious October 30, 2009, 11:49 am
        
        Re: really - Sasha1 October 30, 2009, 11:57 am
        
        speaking of which.... - curious October 30, 2009, 1:15 pm
      - Re: Sasha: What about this? - Sasha1 October 30, 2009, 9:08 am
        
        Sasha - JB October 30, 2009, 9:19 am
        
        Re: Sasha - Sasha1 October 30, 2009, 9:29 am
        
        sasha--earnest question - ayzika October 30, 2009, 9:32 am
        
        Re: sasha--earnest question - Sasha1 October 30, 2009, 9:46 am
        
        actually, sasha - ayzika October 30, 2009, 9:54 am
        
        Re: sasha--earnest question - Sasha1 October 30, 2009, 9:48 am
- Thanks RD - Michie October 30, 2009, 12:27 am
- Thank you, RD - ayzika October 30, 2009, 7:00 am
« Back to thread

Post a Response

Subject:

Message:

--Previous Message-- : "Argue with that." That's your : response, please JB let's stop this now. I : apologized for my contribution yesterday and : I apologized to the board Curious and : Ayzkika and now you. Move on. I trust you : will benefit others here that are in need of : your support and friendship. : : I am committed to two things today...One. : Not scrumming with you or the board. Two. : Cleaning my home, shopping, preping. So : argue that. : : Best. : RD : : : --Previous Message-- : --Previous Message-- : "Withholding potentially transformative : information (including opinions) from people : is a form of abuse" Only if they ask or : want that information. Otherwise, it becomes : stuffing it down women's throats. : : You can't stuff anything down a woman's : throat if she isn't PRESENT. : : Online, the act of clicking on, opening and : reading a post IS the act of asking for : information from that particular poster. I : think you're forgetting that key point. : : The content of the threads and individual : posts on AJ are HIDDEN unless the user : actively engages in clicking, opening and : reading the information therein. : : Argue with that. : : JB : : : : :

Optional Image URL:

Optional Link Title:
Optional Link URL:

By posting, you confirm that you have read and agreed to be bound by the board's usage terms.